JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 21, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Guillermo Rivera Florez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Los Memorialistas Solicitaron La Suspensión De Revisión De La Ley 1354 De 2009,  Bajo El Argumento De Que Existen Diversas Demandas Radicadas En El Consejo De Estado  Contra El Decreto 4742 Del 16 De Diciembre De 2008,   Y, Que Dichas Pueden Incidir En El Examen Que Realiza La Corte Constitucional Sobre La Ley 1354 De 2009.  Se Decide Declarar Improcedente Las Solicitudes  De Suspension Impetradas.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. DECLARAR improcedente las solicitudes de suspension de la revision de constitucional de la Ley 1354 de 2009 formuladas por los ciudadanos Guillermo Rivera Florez y Cesar Augusto Luque Fandino.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.